British Finance News

EU Finance News

Euro crisis: how will it affect me?

By Paul Farrow – What caused the European debt crisis, how long will it last, and how worried should Britons be?

Europe is in crisis. Austerity measures have been announced in several countries including Greece and Spain, the euro is under pressure and stock markets across the globe have fallen sharply from their recent highs – and it is all due mainly to sovereign debt.

But what is sovereign debt and why has it caused a crisis? And should people in Britain be worried?

We have spoken to the experts to help answer these questions.

Q I keep hearing about sovereign debt. What is it?
National governments issue bonds as a way of borrowing to help meet their spending on education, health, defence and so on. Just like any bond, a sovereign debt bond pays investors interest over its term and the bondholder gets his money back on maturity. In Britain, these bonds are better known as gilts.

Andy Howse, investment director for fixed income at Fidelity, said: “The promise to repay is not a guarantee. The strength of the promise is a function of the size of the debt compared to the economy in question and the cost of servicing that debt. This can change over time and between nation states.”

Q What has caused the debt crisis?
In a word or two, over-borrowing. Sovereign debt is fine so long as the governments have no problem repaying the debt. But several countries have borrowed beyond their means – the ramifications of the financial crisis have left them struggling to repay their debt. This is why the IMF has agreed a financial package to bail them out.

“Greece and other countries will struggle to pay off these debts. This has led to a dramatic spike in borrowing costs for these countries, exacerbating the problems further,” Mr Howse added. “Investors have begun to question the future of European Economic and Monetary Union and whether the crisis may spread beyond the peripheral European countries.”

Q Which countries are affected?
Before last week the main countries that had been affected were Greece, Italy and Portugal. Last week it was the turn of Spain to announce austerity measures, while Ireland has problems too, although it is trying hard to cut its deficit.

Q Will it spread to Britain?
Only Rip van Winkel would be unaware that the UK also has a huge deficit, and so there are concerns that the crisis could spread to these shores. This was why the new coalition moved swiftly by announcing £6bn worth of cuts. This has assured investors, for the time being, that Britain will be able to reduce its deficit and repay gilt investors.

“We have more flexibility and it was very important for George Osborne to reassure global markets that our deficit is being tackled,” said Azad Zangana, European economist at Schroders.

Mr Howse agreed: “A weaker pound should boost the economy by making exports more competitive, and interest rates should remain very low for an extended period. But we can’t ignore this debt crisis in Europe because of the effect it may have on the level of global economic activity.”

Q Should I be worried?
The good news is that Britain has some advantages over the likes of Greece and Spain. The main one is that it does not belong to the euro and so is able to manipulate the pound to try to boost our economy via interest rates. “We can devalue our currency, which makes the borrowing cheaper. Greece can’t do that because it belongs to the euro,” said Mr Zangana.

But don’t get too complacent. Britain’s position is still precarious – £6bn worth of spending cuts won’t be enough to clear our £156bn deficit, and remember that our economy is reliant on its trade links to Europe. “The UK is in a relatively good position. It can set its own interest rates and has its own floating currency, which are important mechanisms for managing economic growth,” said Mr Howse.

“However, the UK is not insulated from debt problems and it is in our interest that the crisis is contained and managed by the EU, IMF and other central banks.”

Q How big an impact could the crisis have on the UK?
Half of all of Britain’s exports go to the Continent, so if Europe’s economy grinds to a halt we will feel the impact. Companies could struggle to increase sales, our economic recovery could hit the buffers and, ultimately, jobs could come under pressure.

Howard Archer, an economist at Investec, said: “There is increased pressure on Britain. The FTSE has been hit already, there are concerns of a double dip, and it’s bad news for exporters, which could have a knock-on effect of the wrong kind on our domestic economy.

“The June 22 Budget is key. If the measures don’t work there will be a loss of confidence in UK assets and that could store up other problems such as higher interest rates.”

Q What about my investments?
You won’t need reminding that every time a dark cloud hangs over our economy, or the economies of our trade partners, stock market investors run for the hills, causing share prices to fall. This is what has happened over the past fortnight or so – the FTSE100 has tumbled from 5,700 to under 5,000, although this week share prices recovered despite the eurozone crisis worsening.

But, again, don’t be complacent. Most experts agree that markets are likely to be jittery for a while yet.

Q Is there a danger of a second banking crisis?
This is something that the markets have been speculating over during the past few weeks. Greek, Spanish and Italian bonds are widely held by governments, banks and institutions worldwide and this is why bank shares have been particularly hit in the recent turbulence.

Mr Howse said: “Central banks and governments have learned tough lessons from the financial crisis of 2008/09 and are very unlikely to let these problems go so far as to break the global banking system.”

Q I bank with Santander. Should I move bank accounts?
Santander recently emphasised that its British operation is self-funding, raising cash from British savers to back loans to British borrowers, and does not require capital from its Spanish parent. Santander’s British subsidiaries are regulated by the Financial Services Authority and individual savers are protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

The FSCS, a statutory safety net, can pay out 100pc of the first £50,000 lost per saver per bank or building society. Up to 90pc of pension and life assurance savings are also protected by the FSCS safety net.

A Santander spokesman said: “Customers need not be worried as both Santander and Santander UK are strong businesses focused on retail banking with no exposure to toxic financial products. Our UK business is strong and has a standalone credit rating of AA.”

Q Will the crisis go on for much longer?
Most likely. The Greek bailout is over three years, which suggests there is no quick fix. “I think we will have a bumpy ride for a few years. There is a real sense of uncertainty on how this crisis will pan out,” said Mr Zangana.

Mr Archer added: “It is very, very fragile and the eurozone crisis is deep-seated and so will not disappear overnight. We need the bailout package to be implemented as soon as possible and for the affected countries to get their act together.”

Q I’m worried about losing money. What should I do?
Fund managers will talk about market blips throwing up buying opportunities while economists will make predictions that are wrong as often as they are right. It comes down to your attitude to risk and your financial goals.

It’s your money and if you are of nervous disposition then invest in safe assets. The safest is cash, of course. Interest rates are low but ask yourself whether you would rather make 2pc or risk losing 10pc.

Review any investments and ensure that your portfolio is diversified for damage limitation reasons if markets implode.

Jeff Salway: Bright ideas to get the country saving: Osborne should take note

THE UK savings crisis has reached a stage at which desperate measures are required. Yet the key to tackling it may lie in simplicity and being creative with the savings and pensions infrastructure already in place – and such a solution has been put forward this week.

That the UK faces an alarming savings crisis is disputed by no-one. The industry and the government have thus far attempted to tackle it on the “lead-a-horse-to-water” basis that incentivisation is the only answer, through products such as stakeholder and Isas.

That has helped, but has fallen a long way short of what’s needed.

This is where a report published this week by Edinburgh-based insurer Aegon, in conjunction with the Association of Independent Financial Advisers, makes a vital contribution to the debate. Its proposals for tackling the crisis come partly from the angle of behavioural finance, and one suggestion stands out in particular.

What’s the biggest objection to saving for a pension? Typically it is a lack of spare cash, often because of more urgent debt repayments. The report suggests a “debt-to-saving” model, which would work by diverting both employer and employee contributions into a workplace pension to repay the consolidated debts and then to build up a pension pot once the account is in the black, with only the “positive” contributions receiving tax relief.

A host of potential objections spring to mind, but the objections are, on the whole, easily surmounted. The employee must commit to a period of pension payments once the debt is repaid; the employer wins staff loyalty; the government saves on benefits in the long-term; and two inter-related problems – rising debt and falling savings – would be tackled in what is arguably a win-win scenario.

Another simple but effective proposal in the report is already in action – a “save back” option allowing shoppers to divert money into their savings accounts at the point of purchase, in the same way that they can request cash back. Some supermarkets already offer Save Back, including Sainsbury’s, and it will feature prominently in the Tesco Bank proposition.

The new government has so far given no indication that it has credible ideas to tackle the savings crisis. Instead, it has announced two policies – raising capital gains tax and scrapping child trust funds – that undermine George Osborne’s pre-election rhetoric about restoring the savings culture. If the government is serious about creating a new savings culture, fresh thinking, such as Aegon’s proposals, must be taken seriously.

Equitable Life
A YEAR ago the Parliamentary Ombudsman, Ann Abraham, criticised ministers for rejecting her recommendations on Equitable Life. In 2008, Abraham found that regulatory failure by various government departments contributed to thousands of policyholders losing their retirement savings after the near-collapse of the insurer in 2000. The government acknowledged some regulatory failures, but decided that compensation would be means-tested.

Now the new government says it will set up an independent scheme in which non-means-tested redress would be paid to former and existing policyholders and the dependants of policyholders who had died. All very promising, but policyholders are not counting their chickens just yet – with a cost that could reach £5 billion, the promised compensation will doubtless be subject to yet more delays and revision.

BT bullish about Global Services

BT shares gained 11 per cent after the company restored confidence that it had turned around its Global Services unit and reassured investors that it expected to start growing again within three years.

The price rose by 13.1p to 133.6p after the company revealed a robust outlook for the coming year, when it will slash a further £900 million in costs from the business. It cut £1.8 million of costs during the past year, which helped to restore profitability at the telecoms company. It also dispelled concerns about its ability to compete in the broadband market after adding 123,000 customers in the three months to March 31, outstripping growth reported at rival providers.

BT has stripped cost out of Global Services, its IT services unit that weighed on the company’s share price after a massive writedown in value last year, and now expects the unit to contribute to generate cash, rather than drain it, within two years.

It also said that it would pour extra funds into expanding in the Asia Pacific region, where Global Services is recording strong growth. Ian Livingston, BT chief executive, dismissed concerns that the expansion could push costs up: “It will be very controlled.”

BT will spend £1 billion extending its superfast broadband to reach two thirds of Britons by 2015, taking its total spend on the new network to £2.5 billion. It will also pour an additional £200 million into new services over the coming year, including a revamp of its BT Vision TV service and a new smartphone for the home that it is testing.

BT expects to offer its customers Sky Sports 1 and 2 as part of a sports package including ESPN in time for the new Premier League season. It will sell the channels for less than £20, although analysts have expressed concern that the company may make a small loss when signing up customers. BT hit back by saying that the channels would be part of a bundle and so it would not lose money.

The company has also taken a 2.6 per cent stake in OnLive, a Silicon Valley video games platform, and will bundle the service into its broadband packages on an exclusive basis next year. The service, which will launch this summer in the US, allows consumers to stream games without the need for a console and will add a string to BT’s bow when bundling different services around its broadband package.

BT reported a pre-tax profit of £1 billion for the year to March, compared with a loss of £244 million in the previous year. It cut 20,000 jobs over the past year and the company expected to reduce its cost base by a further £900 million this year, raising expectations of further job losses. A final dividend of 4.6p a share, an increase of 6 per cent, will be paid on September 6.

Mr Livingston declined to set a new target for job cuts but said that the company would continue to target third-party workers and temporary staff. “We are trying to focus on protecting our full-time staff,” he said. The company has retrained 5,000 staff and redeployed them to different parts of the company. BT employs 128,000 people, with 96,000 full-time workers.

BT has not relied on job cuts alone to reduce its spending. Mr Livingston said that improvements to customer service and reliability had reduced the cost of handling complaints, which he said have halved in the past year.

He said that BT had reduced engineer visits by half a million a year. A customer used to have a network problem once every nine years, he said, but that had improved to 15 years. “The cost of failure is high,” he said.

BT recorded a 2 per cent fall in revenue last year and expects to report a further decline to £20 billion in the year to March 2011, before returning to positive territory in the year to March 2013. “BT will start to grow again,” Mr Livingston said.

O2 up to 22 million

O2 has added 195,000 new contract customers, boosting its total to almost 22 million by the end of March, a 5.6 per cent rise on the year. It also added 41,000 broadband customers in the period, and Matthew Key, the chief executive , remained confident that, despite the merger of Orange and T-Mobile and the loss of its exclusive iPhone contract, it would continue to outperform its rivals over the year.

Mr Key also took a swipe at the merged company’s new name, Everything Everywhere, which was unveiled this week. “It looks as though they haven’t been able to decide on what brand to choose so they’ve added a new brand on top of the two they have. I wouldn’t have done that if I was running that business,” he said.

FTSE plunges by more than 100 points as eurozone fears return

Nic Fildes, Graham Keeley

London’s leading share index fell by more than 100 points today as the euro crashed to an 18-month low against the dollar over fears a €750 billion (£650 billion) rescue package may not be enough to stem the eurozone debt crisis.

The FTSE 100 index tumbled by 102.6 points to 5,331.17 by mid-morning and the euro dipped below the $1.25 level for the first time since March last year, trading 0.4 per cent lower at $1.244 — the lowest since November 2008.

The currency has lost ground all week after hitting $1.31 in the wake of the rescue deal announced last weekend by the European Union and IMF, which briefly boosted sentiment.

The pound weakened this morning, falling 0.4 per cent against the dollar to $1.453 and also against the euro, which was worth 85.86p. Traders said that Thursday’s close under $1.48 was not a good sign and that it could test last year’s low of $1.35.

In contrast, gold hit a new high of $1,249.40 an ounce as investors sought a safe-haven in precious metals.

The euro, which has lost 12 per cent this year against the dollar, has been under pressure as budget cuts in Greece, Spain and Portugal have given rise to concerns about social unrest and damage to the economic recovery.

Following violent clashes in Athens after the Government introduced steep cuts to public spending, Spain is now facing strikes over its austerity measures.

Spain’s two biggest unions, the CCOO and the UGT, are to stage the walkout on June 2 and have threatened to call a general strike to protest at public sector wage cuts aimed at reducing the country’s soaring deficit and restoring the confidence of the markets.

Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, the Spanish Prime Minister, announced a wide-ranging series of cuts including reducing public sector wages by 5 per cent cut this year, freezing civil service salaries in 2011 and reducing public spending by €6 billion.

Mr Zapatero, who has faced repeated calls to take drastic measures to reduce Spain’s deficit – including a telephone plea from Barrack Obama – finally acted but appears to have alienated his natural political allies, the unions.

Spain’s Socialist Government has been at pains to reduce fears in the financial markets that it could follow Greece into the economic mire. Unemployment stands at 20 per cent and the deficit is 9.3 per cent of GDP.

Analysts at UBS said that the euro could weaken further if markets continued to question the ability of the EU’s stabilisation package to allay concerns about the debt crisis. Even if those fears were dampened, tighter fiscal policy could be lead to a weaker euro.

The investment bank has slashed its end-2010 target for the euro to $1.15 from $1.30 and also cut its forecast for the end of 2011 to $1.10, compared with earlier estimates of $1.25.

UBS said that fiscal tightening measures in Britain following the formation of a new government should push the pound down against the dollar but could see it strengthen against the euro. It reduced its year-end target for the pound to $1.35 from $1.44.

UK goods trade gap hits £7.5bn

The UK’s goods trade gap hit a disappointing £7.5 billion in March amid little sign of an export-led recovery, official figures have shown.

The deficit – well ahead of an upwardly-revised £6.3 billion for February – came as total imports surged £1.4 billion over the month compared with a meagre £200 million rise in exports.

Exports are sluggish despite the fastest monthly growth in nearly eight years from manufacturers over the month and a weak pound – dealing a blow to hopes that trade could help a still-fragile UK economy pull away from the impact of recession.

The figures showed export prices up 2.9% over the month, outstripping a 2.7% rise in import prices.

Vicky Redwood, of Capital Economics, said underlying export prices had risen 4.5% since November and added: “Exporters still seem to be using the lower pound to boost their export margins, rather than increase market share.”

Excluding volatile items such as oil, export volumes actually fell 1.8% over the month, compared with a 3.5% rise in imports.

While Tuesday’s manufacturing figures are expected to add around 0.1 percentage points to the UK’s 0.2% overall growth in the first quarter, trade is still dragging back the performance of the economy.

The British Chambers of Commerce called for more support for exporters.

Chief economist David Kern said: “Businesses urgently need short-term trade finance support, so that our exporters can get their goods and services out to the global market as the recovery continues.

“We must remember that business exports will be at the centre of any meaningful UK recovery over the next few years.”

IMF chief tries to shore up fraying G20 unity

World Bank President Robert Zoellick (2nd L) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn (3rd L) attend the G-24 meeting of the spring IMF-World Bank meeting at the IMF headquarters building in Washington April 22, 2010. Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

(Reuters) – The IMF sought to maintain unity within the Group of 20 economic powers on Thursday, urging countries not to go separate ways in reforming the financial sector, as frictions emerged over a controversial plan to tax banks.

At the start of four days of meetings in Washington, International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn said countries need to ensure they are moving in the same direction on regulatory reform if they are to curb the risky practices blamed for the global financial crisis.

“Our main concern is to have everyone working together and to maintain the cooperation momentum,” he said.

Finance ministers and central bankers will assess progress toward repairing recession-torn economies and building a more stable platform for growth, there were signs of divisions, particularly between countries hard hit by the banking troubles and those that largely escaped the pain.

The IMF this week proposed two new taxes on banks to help prevent a repeat of the kind of risk-taking that contributed to the global credit crisis. Britain and other countries welcomed the idea, but Canada is firmly opposed to such a tax.

“We’re a sovereign country,” said Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty.

“We can regulate our banks and our other financial institutions as we see fit. As the finance minister of Canada, I’m not going to impose a tax on our banks that performed well during the financial crisis. It seems to me a very odd thing to do.”

G20 finance ministers are expected to discuss the IMF’s bank tax proposals on Friday, and a final report will be presented at June meetings of G20 heads of state in Toronto.

REBALANCING COOPERATION
Strauss-Kahn also urged the G20 to cooperate on measures to rebalance the global economy so that huge surpluses in countries such as China and massive deficits across the rich world don’t trigger another crisis.

The IMF has grown more vocal this week in calling for rich countries to allow their currencies to weaken while China’s yuan strengthens, but the G20 has said little about foreign exchange matters.

The IMF has been careful not to lay all of the blame on China, saying that advanced countries need to let their currencies, the euro and dollar, weaken to promote exports.

Strauss-Kahn said while it was in the interest of China’s economy to allow its currency to rise, he did not expect Beijing to revalue the yuan overnight.

He expects China to “contemplate over time some revaluation of the currency.”

He said rebalancing the global economy should be a global effort and not only a discussion between two countries.

The IMF and World Bank face their own rebalancing act as they try to reallocate internal voting power to give major emerging economies greater representation. World Bank President Robert Zoellick urged member countries to put aside differences over how votes ought to be split and reach an equitable deal.

NO SILVER BULLET FOR GREECE
While the financial crisis has waned, policymakers are now intensely focused on sovereign debt as Greece’s troubles intensify and threaten to spill over into other European countries, such as Portugal.

With an IMF mission currently in Athens, Strauss-Kahn said the talks over rescue plans for Greece will take “some days.” He said an upward revision in Greece’s budget deficit “doesn’t help.”

He said, “If the problem has to start a little worse than we expected, we will take that into account, that will be part of the discussion we have with Greek authorities in the coming days,” he said. “There is no silver bullet to solve it in an easy manner.”

Asked whether he was concerned about sovereign debt among countries in the euro zone, the former French economy minister said there were other countries where debt was much larger.

“The sovereign debt in the euro zone taken as a whole is rather lower than in many other parts of the world, so if you consider the euro zone as a whole it has no specific problem with debt,” he said.

Moody’s Investors Service cut Greece’s sovereign debt to A3 on Thursday and said it was likely to reduce the rating further unless the deficit-burdened government was able to restore market confidence.

For now, he said, he did not expect other countries in the euro zone to need IMF help. “We don’t see a need these days to focus on any other countries but Greece,” Strauss-Kahn added.

Barclays’ first quarter profit fails to impress

Barclays said there were signs the economic recovery had started.

Shares in High Street banking giant Barclays have fallen 6.4% despite a big rise in pre-tax profits for the first three months of 2010.

Barclays’ profit for the first quarter was £1.82bn, up 47% on a year earlier, with most of it coming from investment banking arm Barclays Capital.

However, analysts said that the amount of money made by that division was less than expected.

Barclays was the biggest faller on the FTSE 100 index, down 23p to 338.25p.

The bank’s strengthened investment banking division reported profit before tax of £1.47bn during the first three months of the year, up 47% on the same period a year ago.

“It is not a bad quarter, it’s just not the blow-out numbers shown by some of the other banks,” said Colin Morton, fund manager at Rensburg Fund Management.

“It has gone into the numbers with very high expectations, and BarCap has come in a bit light in terms of income,” he said.

Economic recovery

“If we don’t pay our top people [appropriately], they leave very quickly

Sir Philip Hampton Royal Bank of Scotland chairman RBS chief says ‘bankers overpaid’

Another contribution to the profit rise came from retail banking, up 20% to £238m, but this included a gain of £71m on the acquisition of Standard Life Bank.

A number of banks have now reported improving conditions, as declining bad debts reflect improving economies.

“The improvement that we have seen in impairment reflects the signs of economic recovery now evident in many of the markets we operate,” said chief executive John Varley.

The news cames as the Barclays board faced the group’s shareholders at its annual general meeting.

Shareholders approved the bank’s remuneration report, with only 8% voting against or withholding their vote.

Barclays chairman Marcus Agius conceded thatbanks had to “show contrition” and that the industry’s reputation was at “dangerously low” levels.

Reflecting public and political concern about the levels of bankers’ pay, he said it should be “competitive, but no more”.

His comments followed those of the chairman of Royal Bank of Scotland, Sir Philip Hampton, who told the BBC that bankers’ pay was “astonishingly high”.

Barclays defended the pay of its head of investment banking Bob Diamond, who is reported to have earned more than £60m last year, although Barclays has said this is hugely exaggerated.

The bank’s deputy chairman Sir Richard Broadbent, who heads its remuneration committee said that Mr Diamond’s package would “pay out nothing unless stretching performance targets are met”.

Messy blame game could follow US oil spill

By Jorn Madslien – Business reporter, BBC News: Investigators will seek to determine why the blowout preventer failed to shut off the flow of oil from the well.

BP has seen its reputation hammered and the value of its shares plunge after an explosion that damaged and sank the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico.

The accident may have cost 11 workers their lives, yet it is not the explosion and its deadly consequences that have caused such widespread concern and anger.

Instead, it seems that people are most worried about the subsequent massive leak from the oil well which the rig had been drilling into.

Some 5,000 barrels (210,000 gallons) of oil is gushing into the sea off the coast of Louisiana, threatening vast devastation to the nearby marine life and coastal industries.

Double whammy
It was never meant to happen.

Following the explosion, which industry observers believe was caused by a pressure “kick” from the well that pushed natural gas up to the platform, a fail-safe mechanism was supposed to have been automatically activated to prevent the leak – similar to the way water mains can be cut off in the event of a leaking pipe in the home.

Evidently, that did not happen.

So it seems clear that much attention will be given to Deepwater Horizon’s so-called “blowout preventer”, which was supposed to have cut off the flow of oil.

The blowout preventer was clearly faulty. Indeed, it seems efforts to close it manually – with the help of underwater robots – have also failed.

So two things have happened here.

Firstly, there was an explosion, which should not have taken place.

And then there there was the apparent failure in the planned response to the accident, namely the prevention of the leak.

Shared blame?
So who should be blamed?

On a public image level, BP cannot afford to be seen to be passing the buck
Robert Perkins, energy expert, Platts

For starters, BP is clearly going to have to cover the costs involved in stopping the leak and in cleaning up the mess.

And industry observers do not expect the UK-based company to step away from its responsibilities.

But Transocean – the world’s largest offshore drilling contractor, which owns and operates the rig on behalf of BP – may also be blamed, as might Cameron International – the company that manufactured the blowout preventer in 2001.

“The arguments about liability are going to be a right mess,” predicts Robert Perkins of energy expert, Platts.

Once the emergency in the Gulf of Mexico is over, investigators will move in to try and determine exactly what went wrong.

Next, the lawyers will examine their findings to determine who should be blamed for what.

Flexible partners
The predictably messy aftermath will be an indication of how the oil industry operates.

Though oil majors such as BP are at the helm of the exploration and extraction industry, they never carry out all of the work themselves.

Oil services companies, such as Transocean, do much on its behalf and it is not always clear who should be blamed when things go wrong.

Indeed, large oil companies contract out jobs for a number of reasons.

Oil services companies tend to possess specialist knowledge and equipment, whether they are dedicated to exploration, to production, to transportation, or to repairs and maintenance.

They also offer the oil majors some local expertise – or they deliver the local input that is often required by governments eager to harness economic benefits from exploration or production activities by foreign companies.

And they share the economic risk of projects. Typically, during periods of low oil prices the oil majors cut back on exploration projects, leaving their suppliers idle.

In return, the same companies know to up their charges during periods when demand for their services is high – not least because they will have to set aside money to invest in cost-saving technologies to remain competitive.

But although the oil services companies often get paid to take on financial risk, they will rarely be left with overall project responsibilities.

During times of crisis, it is not an option for the likes of BP to simply walk away, believes Mr Perkins.

“On a public image level, BP cannot afford to be seen to be passing the buck.”

RBS chief Sir Philip Hampton says bankers ‘overpaid’

The chairman of the part-nationalised Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has conceded that many bank employees earn too much.

Sir Philip Hampton said it was very difficult to defend the massive gap between what most people earned and what some bank employees were paid.

He said “bankers’ pay continues to be astonishingly high”.

However, he told BBC Radio 4 that the banks had no choice if they wanted to retain the best people.

“If we don’t pay our top people [appropriately], they leave very quickly,” he said.

“Our top people are very much in demand and we have seen a significant loss of our top people.”

But Sir Philip admitted that it was “difficult to defend the massive differential” between bankers’ pay and that elsewhere in the economy.

RBS is 83% owned by taxpayers after it was bailed out by the government.

Earlier this week, Sir Philip vowed to listen to investor concerns over its new bonus scheme for top bosses.

A quarter of performance-linked rewards are triggered when RBS’s share price hits 50p, but that target has already been met.

This has angered some investors, who have seen shares slump and dividends scrapped since the bank was bailed out.

At the bank’s AGM on Wednesday, shareholders called for assurances that performance rewards would be toughened up.

BBC

Dundee first university in UK to offer Islamic course in financing

By FIONA MACLEOD

A SCOTTISH university is to offer the UK’s first postgraduate course in Islamic finance.

Dundee University will unveil its MSc in Islamic accounting and finance at a conference on ethical finance in Edinburgh today. The course has been created to meet increased demand from the banking sector.

Dr Rania Kamla, a lecturer in the accountancy and finance department at Dundee who will lead the new course, said high street banks were increasingly catering for Muslims and needed knowledgeable staff.

She said Islamic banking should not invest in areas in conflict with the religion’s teachings such as pork products, alcohol, the arms trade, or pornography.

“But it is also about the deeper impact, so it would also encourage investment in communities and try to reach out to disadvantaged groups, “she added.

There is only one dedicated bank that adheres to the teachings of Sharia law, the Islamic Bank of Britain.

Dr Kamla said: “It was originally based in London and Birmingham, but has now expanded to Scotland. Up to 20 financial institutions in the UK now provide Islamic products, including HSBC. It is not allowed in Islam to charge interest, therefore they promote interest-free banking.

“Instead, they depend on profit and loss sharing, so you both share in the risk.”

The MSc course, which begins in September, is expected to take a handful of students in the first year while the university gauges demand.

Omar Shaikh of the Islamic Finance Council said: “This is a wonderful opportunity for Scottish students to study Islamic finance, in Scotland.

“Education is extremely important if we are to realise the ambition to make Scotland and UK a global gateway for Islamic finance.”

Legal firm Tods Murray, which created the first Islamic mortgage in Scotland, organised today’s conference. Partner Graham Burnside said: “The role of Islamic finance and ethical-based financial systems in today’s economy has not been fully explored, and the launch of Dundee University’s course is an important step to ensure that Scotland does not miss out on the potential it offers.”

The Islamic and Ethical Finance Conference, takes place at the Tods Murray headquarters in Edinburgh Quay, and will explore the various faces of ethical finance and Scotland’s heritage in faith-based finance.

Speakers include specialists from the Islamic finance industry and representatives from the Church of Scotland, the Co-Op Bank and the Scottish Widows Investment Partnership.

Professor Christine Helliar, dean of the school of accounting and finance at Dundee University, said of the new course: “Graduates will be able to bridge the gap between accounting and financial knowledge and how it relates to Islamic law. The programme will include an introductory element to the main issues, coverage of the most popular products and how they relate to Sharia law, and how conventional banks compare with the practices of Islamic banks.”

DIVINE PROFITS
UNDER Islamic teaching usury is not allowed therefore borrowing money must be done under special arrangements.

For example if you wanted a mortgage to buy a property, the bank would buy the house and then sell it back to you but charge you profit.

In other words the deal would be based on profit sharing by both parties rather than interest payments.

This is because profit is allowed under Sharia law while charging interest on debt is considered immoral.

Islam also precludes banking which invests in businesses which go against the teachings of the religion.

So for example, it would be un-Islamic to invest in the arms trade or pornography.

But it would also not be seen as ethical to gain profit out of firms that are involved with pork products or alcohol which are also barred by the religion.

Powered by WordPress | T-Mobile Phones for Sale at BestInCellPhones.com | Thanks to Free Phones at iCellPhoneDeals.com, Free MMORPG Games and Fat burning furnace review